Compare / DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Step 3.5 Flash

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Step 3.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
Step 3.5 Flash
Stepfun · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Step 3.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.30 per million tokens, 2.0 times less.
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (16.6 and 16.6).
  • On our business benchmarks, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpStep 3.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.27 in · $0.41 out$0.10 in · $0.30 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.30$0.15
Cheapest host, blended––
Intelligence Index16.616.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window163,840 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseDeepSeek V3.2 ExpStep 3.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 70 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 102 of 195 96 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 69 of 187 99 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 41 of 153 123 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricDeepSeek V3.2 ExpStep 3.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4461,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4091,345
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4491,429
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4161,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4251,393
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4101,366
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 16.616.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.7%83.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 14.9%21.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 54.1%64.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 72.3%50.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 31.1%27.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 33.9%94.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 25.0%42.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 54.045.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Step 3.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts; Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.30 for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp.

Run DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Step 3.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.