Compare / Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · profile
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiniMax M2.7? The short answer

  • MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper: $0.52 against $0.85 per million tokens, 38% less.
  • MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.8 against 13.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Gemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.7
Price per million tokens$0.30 in · $2.50 out$0.30 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.85$0.52
Cheapest host, blended$0.42 (Google AI Studio)$0.37 (GMICloud, FP8)
Intelligence Index13.122.8
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,048,576 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.7
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 74 of 161 100 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 115 of 195 68 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 93 of 187 108 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 66 of 153 124 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemini 2.5 FlashMiniMax M2.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4371,422
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3991,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3941,363
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4241,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4001,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4091,415
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4021,386
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.122.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.0%87.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 12.1%29.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 50.3%75.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 65.3%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 13.6%39.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 31.6%84.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.0%99.4%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 7.8%12.9%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than MiniMax M2.7?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts; MiniMax M2.7 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or MiniMax M2.7?

MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.85 for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Run Gemini 2.5 Flash and MiniMax M2.7 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.