Compare / Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · profile
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Gemini 2.5 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.1? The short answer

  • Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper: $0.80 against $0.85 per million tokens, 6% less.
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 13.1 against 9.2.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Gemini 2.5 FlashMistral Medium 3.1
Price per million tokens$0.30 in · $2.50 out$0.40 in · $2.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.85$0.80
Cheapest host, blended$0.42 (Google AI Studio)$0.80 (Mistral)
Intelligence Index13.19.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,048,576 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USFrance

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Medium 3.1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 74 of 161 119 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 115 of 195 157 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 93 of 187 110 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 66 of 153 130 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemini 2.5 FlashMistral Medium 3.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4371,429
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3991,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3941,378
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4241,410
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4001,395
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4091,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4021,386
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.19.20
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.0%58.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 12.1%4.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 50.3%39.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 65.3%42.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 13.6%10.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 31.6%40.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.0%99.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 7.8%22.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.80 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.85 for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Run Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.