Compare / Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Kimi K2 0711
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Kimi K2 0711
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 21 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Gemini 2.5 Flash or Kimi K2 0711? The short answer
- Gemini 2.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.85 against $1.00 per million tokens, 15% less.
- They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (13.1 and 12.7).
- On our business benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.
- On our business benchmarks, Kimi K2 0711 ranks higher for agents and tool use and writing.
At a glance
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2 0711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.30 in · $2.50 out | $0.57 in · $2.30 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.85 | $1.00 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.42 (Google AI Studio) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 13.1 | 12.7 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | – |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2 0711 |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 74 of 161 | 18 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 115 of 195 | 128 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 93 of 187 | 80 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 66 of 153 | not measured |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Kimi K2 0711 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,399 | 1,409 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,394 | 1,371 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,424 | 1,417 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,400 | 1,381 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,409 | 1,418 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,402 | 1,375 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 13.1 | 12.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 79.0% | 76.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 12.1% | 7.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 50.3% | 41.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 65.3% | 53.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 13.6% | 15.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 31.6% | 61.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 93.7% | 87.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 41.3% | 29.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 36.2% | 50.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 56.2% | 59.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 75.0% | 75.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 88.1% | 81.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 78.2% | 78.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 62.0% | 66.5% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Kimi K2 0711?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemini 2.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge; Kimi K2 0711 ranks higher for agents and tool use and writing.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Kimi K2 0711?
Gemini 2.5 Flash costs $0.85 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.00 for Kimi K2 0711.
Run Gemini 2.5 Flash and Kimi K2 0711 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.