Compare / Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 12 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · profile
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
12
Shared sources
3

Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-5.6 Luna? The short answer

  • GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.45 against $0.85 per million tokens, 47% less.
  • GPT-5.6 Luna scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 37.3 against 13.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Gemini 2.5 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna
Price per million tokens$0.30 in · $2.50 out$0.20 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.85$0.45
Cheapest host, blended$0.42 (Google AI Studio)$0.23 (OpenAI)
Intelligence Index13.137.3
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 74 of 161 47 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 20 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 115 of 195 38 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 93 of 187 57 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 66 of 153 59 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemini 2.5 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4371,461
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3991,463
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3941,412
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4241,491
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4001,446
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4091,454
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4021,435
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 13.137.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.0%91.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 12.1%39.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 65.3%83.7%
Vending-Bench 2reportedMoney after a yearUS dollars $548.84$4,094.71

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than GPT-5.6 Luna?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GPT-5.6 Luna ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.45 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.85 for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

Run Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-5.6 Luna on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.