Compare / Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google · profile
Ministral 3 14B 2512
Mistral · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ministral 3 14B 2512? The short answer

  • Ministral 3 14B 2512 is cheaper: $0.20 against $3.44 per million tokens, 17 times less.
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.1 against 6.0.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Gemini 2.5 ProMinistral 3 14B 2512
Price per million tokens$1.25 in · $10.00 out$0.20 in · $0.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$3.44$0.20
Cheapest host, blended$1.72 (Google AI Studio)$0.20 (Mistral)
Intelligence Index16.16.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–91
Context window1,048,576 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USFrance

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemini 2.5 ProMinistral 3 14B 2512
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 109 of 161 128 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 92 of 195 167 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 42 of 187 143 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 38 of 153 146 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemini 2.5 ProMinistral 3 14B 2512
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 33.314.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 16.16.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 84.4%57.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 22.5%4.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 48.7%32.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 69.0%26.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 46.3%23.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 28.5%9.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 26.5%4.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 9.7%6.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 54.1%27.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 19.0%24.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.400.32
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 65.231.4
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.1%99.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 7.0%19.4%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Ministral 3 14B 2512?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemini 2.5 Pro ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Run Gemini 2.5 Pro and Ministral 3 14B 2512 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.