Compare / Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.2
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.2
16 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,431 | 1,425 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,142 | 1,162 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,462 | 1,442 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,437 | 1,444 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,443 | 1,391 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,458 | 1,475 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,438 | 1,427 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,446 | 1,437 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,445 | 1,411 |
| tau2-benchreported | Consistency (pass^4)% of tasks | 1.0% | 18.6% |
| tau2-benchreported | Task success (pass^1)% of tasks | 13.7% | 32.2% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 19.0% | 76.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 65.2 | 49.4 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.1% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 7.0% | 8.4% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.