Models / GPT-5.2

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

72 published results from 6 sources. Each card shows where the number comes from and what it does not measure. Results are never combined into one score.

Provider
OpenAI
Sources
6
Our benchmarks
0
Price
Not yet published

Reported by others

1,425
Overall · rank 36 of 44
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,419 to 1,431
Sample
28212 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
13 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,423
Overall · rank 35 of 44
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,414 to 1,433
Sample
7108 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
13 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,162
Overall · rank 24 of 34
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,156 to 1,167
Sample
52712 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
24 Aug 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,137
Overall · rank 28 of 34
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,131 to 1,143
Sample
75658 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
24 Aug 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,442
Overall · rank 63 of 177
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,440 to 1,445
Sample
82944 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not an error rate: claims that cannot be checked on the web are skipped, and preference still carries most of the weight.
1,442
Overall · rank 65 of 177
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,438 to 1,445
Sample
49030 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not an error rate: claims that cannot be checked on the web are skipped, and preference still carries most of the weight.
1,444
Business, management and finance · rank 60 of 402
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,438 to 1,450
Sample
16851 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,443
Business, management and finance · rank 60 of 402
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,437 to 1,450
Sample
9768 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,391
Creative writing · rank 94 of 407
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,385 to 1,397
Sample
13750 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,387
Creative writing · rank 97 of 407
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,379 to 1,394
Sample
7645 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,459
Expert prompts · rank 73 of 359
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,452 to 1,467
Sample
7976 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,475
Expert prompts · rank 41 of 359
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,465 to 1,485
Sample
3993 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,424
Instruction following · rank 83 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,419 to 1,429
Sample
27771 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,427
Instruction following · rank 76 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,421 to 1,433
Sample
15266 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,436
Overall · rank 86 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,432 to 1,439
Sample
83555 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,437
Overall · rank 83 of 409
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,434 to 1,441
Sample
49570 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,411
Writing, literature and language · rank 84 of 408
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,406 to 1,417
Sample
20281 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
1,408
Writing, literature and language · rank 88 of 408
Unit
Arena rating, higher is better
Range
1,402 to 1,414
Sample
11497 votes
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
25 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not accuracy or correctness: it ranks which answer voters preferred, with answer length and formatting controlled for.
45.8%
Memory · rank 13 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not long-term personal memory in a product: sessions are BFCL's scripted ones.
3.9%
Memory · rank 92 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not long-term personal memory in a product: sessions are BFCL's scripted ones.
28.1%
Multi-turn tasks · rank 42 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not open-ended agent work: the tools and tasks are BFCL's simulated APIs.
43.8%
Multi-turn tasks · rank 24 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not open-ended agent work: the tools and tasks are BFCL's simulated APIs.
55.9%
Overall accuracy · rank 16 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not a neutral average: the weighting is BFCL's. Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
45.3%
Overall accuracy · rank 38 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not a neutral average: the weighting is BFCL's. Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
75.0%
Relevance detection · rank 62 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not whether the call itself was right; only that one was attempted.
75.0%
Relevance detection · rank 62 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not whether the call itself was right; only that one was attempted.
81.8%
Single-turn calls (curated) · rank 67 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
78.3%
Single-turn calls (curated) · rank 79 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
70.4%
Single-turn calls (user-contributed) · rank 58 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
67.1%
Single-turn calls (user-contributed) · rank 73 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not reliability on your own tools: BFCL's functions and queries are a fixed test set, and a correct call is judged by its form, not by what it achieved.
75.5%
Web search · rank 10 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not general research quality: questions have short, checkable answers.
40.5%
Web search · rank 30 of 109
Unit
% correct, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
16 Dec 2025
Not shown
Not general research quality: questions have short, checkable answers.
Reported by OpenHands Index
58.8%
Average · rank 10 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
30.9%
Front end (SWE-Bench Multimodal) · rank 20 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
50.0%
Greenfield (Commit0) · rank 6 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
65.5%
Information gathering (GAIA) · rank 16 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
74.6%
Issue resolution (SWE-Bench) · rank 13 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by OpenHands Index
73.2%
Testing (SWT-Bench) · rank 10 of 34
Unit
% resolved, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
30 Jun 2026
Not shown
Not the model alone: the score is for the model inside the OpenHands agent, at the SDK version shown.
Reported by tau2-bench
72.0%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 1 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
22.0%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 8 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
83.0%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 2 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
52.5%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 8 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
18.6%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 11 of 21
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
32.2%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 13 of 21
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
4.1%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 1 of 1
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
12.6%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 1 of 1
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
51.8%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 2 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
45.6%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 6 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
81.6%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 2 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
75.0%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 6 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
71.9%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 4 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
30.7%
Consistency (pass^4) · rank 8 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
89.7%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 5 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
5 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by tau2-bench
57.2%
Task success (pass^1) · rank 8 of 8
Unit
% of tasks, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
26 May 2026
Not shown
Not your policies or customers: the tasks and policies are tau2's own, and the customer is simulated by gpt-5.2.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
76.0%
Requested-length error · rank 334 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
103.0%
Requested-length error · rank 350 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
93.0%
Requested-length error · rank 345 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
112.0%
Requested-length error · rank 355 of 370
Unit
% off the requested word count, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not other format limits such as character counts or bullet counts.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.38
Style adherence · rank 62 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.40
Style adherence · rank 34 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.37
Style adherence · rank 90 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
0.38
Style adherence · rank 65 of 370
Unit
score from 0 to 1, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not brand voice on your own examples: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
49.4
Writing score · rank 159 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
43.9
Writing score · rank 185 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
44.1
Writing score · rank 182 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
Reported by UGI Leaderboard
39.2
Writing score · rank 220 of 370
Unit
score out of 100, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
4 Mar 2026
Not shown
Not business copy quality: UGI's prompts are private and lean towards creative writing, and models that often refuse get no score.
100.0%
Answer rate · rank 1 of 108
Unit
% of documents, higher is better
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
22 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a quality score: a low rate usually means content filters were triggered, and hallucination rates are measured on answered documents only.
100.0%
Answer rate · rank 1 of 108
Unit
% of documents, higher is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
22 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not a quality score: a low rate usually means content filters were triggered, and hallucination rates are measured on answered documents only.
10.8%
Hallucination rate · rank 68 of 108
Unit
% of summaries, lower is better
Configuration
GPT-5.2 (high)
Measured
22 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not errors in open questions or other tasks: only summarisation, judged by Vectara's own model (HHEM-2.3), not by people, on news-style documents rather than your data.
8.4%
Hallucination rate · rank 43 of 108
Unit
% of summaries, lower is better
Configuration
gpt-5.2
Measured
22 Sep 2026
Not shown
Not errors in open questions or other tasks: only summarisation, judged by Vectara's own model (HHEM-2.3), not by people, on news-style documents rather than your data.

Compare GPT-5.2 with