Compare / Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 21 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B? The short answer
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.088 against $0.56 per million tokens, 6.4 times less.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 15.6 against 8.9.
- On our business benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
At a glance
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.25 in · $1.50 out | $0.050 in · $0.20 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.56 | $0.088 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.28 (Google AI Studio) | $0.088 (Crusoe, FP8) |
| Intelligence Index | 15.6 | 8.9 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 220 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 93 of 161 | 145 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 99 of 195 | 130 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 78 of 187 | 169 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 73 of 153 | 121 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,433 | 1,362 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,421 | 1,317 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,413 | 1,241 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,443 | 1,331 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,407 | 1,291 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,433 | 1,313 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,420 | 1,267 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 34.7 | 14.4 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 15.6 | 8.90 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 82.2% | 75.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 17.2% | 11.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 77.2% | 71.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 74.3% | 38.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 43.4% | 30.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 31.1% | 6.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 24.2% | 13.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 9.7% | 6.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 31.3% | 40.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.6% | 99.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 8.2% | 9.6% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.088 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.56 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview.
Run Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.