Compare / Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
Google · profile
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)? The short answer

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is cheaper: $0.56 against $4.38 per million tokens, 7.8 times less.
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 15.6 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Price per million tokens$0.25 in · $1.50 out$2.50 in · $10.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.56$4.38
Cheapest host, blended$0.28 (Google AI Studio)$4.38 (Azure)
Intelligence Index15.67.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,048,576 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 93 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 99 of 195 176 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 78 of 187 152 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 73 of 153 105 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4211,302
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4131,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4431,312
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4071,319
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4331,336
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4201,341
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 15.67.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 82.2%52.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 17.2%2.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 77.2%36.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 74.3%41.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 24.2%8.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 31.3%28.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.6%93.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 8.2%9.6%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview better than GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview costs $0.56 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.38 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06).

Run Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview and GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.