Compare / Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 13 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google · profile
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
13
Shared sources
3

Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)? The short answer

  • GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) is cheaper: $0.26 against $1.50 per million tokens, 5.7 times less.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 39.6 against 6.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Gemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
Price per million tokens$0.75 in · $3.75 out$0.15 in · $0.60 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.50$0.26
Cheapest host, blended$0.75 (Google)–
Intelligence Index39.66.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,048,576 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 27 of 161 155 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 12 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 14 of 195 185 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 6 of 187 164 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 14 of 153 148 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4831,311
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4921,294
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5121,285
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4871,293
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4881,318
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4961,314
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 76.111.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 39.66.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 94.5%42.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 47.9%4.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 85.8%5.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 35.5%2.9%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 69.2%8.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.26 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.50 for Gemini 3.7 Flash.

Run Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.