Compare / gemini-3-flash vs GPT-5.2

gemini-3-flash vs GPT-5.2

21 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

gemini-3-flash
Google · profile
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
21
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricgemini-3-flashGPT-5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4391,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1911,162
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4681,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4691,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4571,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4961,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4581,427
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4731,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4611,411
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 49.0%58.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 22.1%30.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 18.8%50.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 58.8%65.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 74.6%74.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 70.7%73.2%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 68.0%72.0%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 82.5%83.0%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 51.8%51.8%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 76.8%81.6%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 70.2%71.9%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 91.2%89.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.