Compare / Gemma 3 12B vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Gemma 3 12B vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemma 3 12B
Google · profile
Ministral 3 14B 2512
Mistral · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Gemma 3 12B or Ministral 3 14B 2512? The short answer

  • Gemma 3 12B is cheaper: $0.075 against $0.20 per million tokens, 2.7 times less.
  • Ministral 3 14B 2512 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 6.0 against 3.8.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemma 3 12B ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Ministral 3 14B 2512 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Gemma 3 12BMinistral 3 14B 2512
Price per million tokens$0.050 in · $0.15 out$0.20 in · $0.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.075$0.20
Cheapest host, blended–$0.20 (Mistral)
Intelligence Index3.86.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–91
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USFrance

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemma 3 12BMinistral 3 14B 2512
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 147 of 161 128 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 195 of 195 167 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 149 of 187 143 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 5 of 153 146 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemma 3 12BMinistral 3 14B 2512
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 5.8014.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 3.806.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 34.9%57.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.2%4.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 36.7%32.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 8.3%26.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 16.4%23.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 0.0%9.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 0.8%4.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 0.8%6.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 10.8%27.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 9.0%24.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.290.32
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 29.931.4
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 97.4%99.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 4.4%19.4%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemma 3 12B better than Ministral 3 14B 2512?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemma 3 12B ranks higher for sticking to the facts; Ministral 3 14B 2512 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Gemma 3 12B costs $0.075 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.20 for Ministral 3 14B 2512.

Run Gemma 3 12B and Ministral 3 14B 2512 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.