Compare / Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-4o (2024-08-06)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Gemma 3 27B
Google · profile
GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Gemma 3 27B or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)? The short answer

  • Gemma 3 27B is cheaper: $0.14 against $4.38 per million tokens, 31 times less.
  • GPT-4o (2024-08-06) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 7.7 against 4.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, Gemma 3 27B ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Gemma 3 27BGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Price per million tokens$0.12 in · $0.20 out$2.50 in · $10.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.14$4.38
Cheapest host, blended$0.10 (DeepInfra, FP8)$4.38 (Azure)
Intelligence Index4.97.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window131,072 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGemma 3 27BGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 142 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 188 of 195 176 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 111 of 187 152 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 96 of 153 105 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGemma 3 27BGPT-4o (2024-08-06)
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3771,302
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3481,327
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3371,312
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3431,319
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3651,336
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3541,341
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 4.907.70
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 42.8%52.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.4%2.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 31.8%36.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 7.3%41.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 3.8%8.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 10.5%28.9%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 98.8%93.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 7.4%9.6%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Gemma 3 27B better than GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemma 3 27B ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts; GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or GPT-4o (2024-08-06)?

Gemma 3 27B costs $0.14 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.38 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06).

Run Gemma 3 27B and GPT-4o (2024-08-06) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.