Compare / Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling Small
Gemma 4 31B vs Inkling Small
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 19 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Gemma 4 31B or Inkling Small? The short answer
- Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.21 against $0.64 per million tokens, 3.1 times less.
- Inkling Small scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 25.7 against 14.7.
- Inkling Small writes faster: 173 tokens a second against 44.
- On our business benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts.
- On our business benchmarks, Inkling Small ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.
At a glance
| Gemma 4 31B | Inkling Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.14 in · $0.40 out | $0.45 in · $1.20 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.21 | $0.64 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.15 (DeepInfra, FP4) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 14.7 | 25.7 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 44 | 173 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 524,288 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 96 of 161 | 68 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 89 of 195 | 58 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 72 of 187 | 100 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 89 of 153 | 126 of 153 |
| Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) | not measured | 4 of 21 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Gemma 4 31B | Inkling Small |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,450 | 1,425 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,449 | 1,408 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,419 | 1,313 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,499 | 1,445 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,453 | 1,393 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,453 | 1,405 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,435 | 1,344 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 43.4 | 52.9 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 14.7 | 25.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 85.7% | 89.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 23.6% | 33.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 69.7% | 75.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Output speedtokens per second | 44.0 | 173 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 45.5% | 49.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 43.4% | 55.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Time to first answer tokenseconds | 0.80 | 13.6 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 14.8% | 18.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 10.4% | 19.1% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Gemma 4 31B better than Inkling Small?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Gemma 4 31B ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts; Inkling Small ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Inkling Small?
Gemma 4 31B costs $0.21 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.64 for Inkling Small.
Which is faster, Gemma 4 31B or Inkling Small?
Inkling Small writes about 173 tokens a second on its usual API, against 44 for Gemma 4 31B (Artificial Analysis).
Run Gemma 4 31B and Inkling Small on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.