Compare / Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Meta · profile
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.1? The short answer

  • Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 against $0.80 per million tokens, 11 times less.
  • Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 9.2 against 4.8.
  • On our business benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.2 1B InstructMistral Medium 3.1
Price per million tokens$0.027 in · $0.20 out$0.40 in · $2.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.071$0.80
Cheapest host, blended–$0.80 (Mistral)
Intelligence Index4.89.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window60,000 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inthe USFrance

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.2 1B InstructMistral Medium 3.1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 161 of 161 119 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 189 of 195 157 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 186 of 187 110 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 130 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 1B InstructMistral Medium 3.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,0701,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,0831,378
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,0821,410
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,0861,395
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1111,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,0761,386
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 4.809.20
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 19.6%58.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 5.5%4.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 22.8%39.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 6.7%42.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 0.0%10.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 0.0%40.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 22.0%27.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.39
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 11.839.5

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Mistral Medium 3.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.071 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3.1.

Run Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.