Compare / Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs gpt-oss-120b

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs gpt-oss-120b

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Meta · profile
gpt-oss-120b
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or gpt-oss-120b? The short answer

  • Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 against $0.26 per million tokens, 3.7 times less.
  • gpt-oss-120b scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 11.6 against 4.8.
  • On our business benchmarks, gpt-oss-120b ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.2 1B Instructgpt-oss-120b
Price per million tokens$0.027 in · $0.20 out$0.15 in · $0.60 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.071$0.26
Cheapest host, blended–$0.065 (CoreWeave, FP4)
Intelligence Index4.811.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–200
Context window60,000 tokens131,072 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.2 1B Instructgpt-oss-120b
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 161 of 161 117 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 49 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 189 of 195 110 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 186 of 187 131 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 138 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 1B Instructgpt-oss-120b
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,0701,351
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,0831,277
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,0821,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,0861,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1111,352
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,0761,309
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 4.8011.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 19.6%78.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 5.5%19.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 22.8%69.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 6.7%52.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 0.0%23.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 0.0%65.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 22.0%107.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.29
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 11.838.5

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct better than gpt-oss-120b?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, gpt-oss-120b ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or gpt-oss-120b?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.071 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.26 for gpt-oss-120b.

Run Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and gpt-oss-120b on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.