Compare / Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs o1

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs o1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Meta · profile
o1
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or o1? The short answer

  • Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 against $26.25 per million tokens, 372 times less.
  • o1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 15.2 against 4.8.
  • On our business benchmarks, o1 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.2 1B Instructo1
Price per million tokens$0.027 in · $0.20 out$15.00 in · $60.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.071$26.25
Cheapest host, blended––
Intelligence Index4.815.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window60,000 tokens200,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.2 1B Instructo1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 161 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 189 of 195 126 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 186 of 187 74 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 86 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 1B Instructo1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,0701,370
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,0831,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,0821,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,0861,407
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1111,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,0761,398
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 4.8015.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 19.6%74.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 5.5%7.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 22.8%70.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 6.7%65.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 0.0%12.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 0.0%62.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 22.0%24.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 11.861.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct better than o1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, o1 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or o1?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct costs $0.071 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $26.25 for o1.

Run Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and o1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.