Compare / Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta · profile
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
NVIDIA · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B? The short answer

  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.088 against $0.12 per million tokens, 27% less.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 8.9 against 5.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.2 3B InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Price per million tokens$0.050 in · $0.33 out$0.050 in · $0.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.12$0.088
Cheapest host, blended$0.12 (Parasail, BF16)$0.088 (Crusoe, FP8)
Intelligence Index5.78.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–220
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.2 3B InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 158 of 161 145 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 183 of 195 130 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 187 of 187 169 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 121 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 3B InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,1461,317
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,1451,241
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,1791,331
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,1461,291
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1671,313
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,1431,267
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 5.708.90
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 25.5%75.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 5.3%11.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 26.2%71.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 4.3%38.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 21.1%40.9%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 31.0%35.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.28
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 10.425.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.088 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.12 for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct.

Run Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.