Compare / Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta · profile
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or GPT-5.6 Sol? The short answer

  • Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is cheaper: $0.12 against $8.00 per million tokens, 67 times less.
  • GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 47.0 against 5.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Sol ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.2 3B InstructGPT-5.6 Sol
Price per million tokens$0.050 in · $0.33 out$4.00 in · $20.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.12$8.00
Cheapest host, blended$0.12 (Parasail, BF16)$2.00 (OpenAI)
Intelligence Index5.747.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window131,072 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.2 3B InstructGPT-5.6 Sol
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 158 of 161 8 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 1 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 183 of 195 7 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 187 of 187 21 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 47 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.2 3B InstructGPT-5.6 Sol
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,1461,485
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,1451,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,1791,534
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,1461,489
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,1671,483
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,1431,483
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 5.7047.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 25.5%94.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 5.3%49.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 26.2%72.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 4.3%84.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 21.1%85.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 31.0%1.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 10.465.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than GPT-5.6 Sol?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GPT-5.6 Sol ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or GPT-5.6 Sol?

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.12 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $8.00 for GPT-5.6 Sol.

Run Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and GPT-5.6 Sol on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.