Compare / Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta · profile
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5? The short answer

  • MiniMax M2.5 is cheaper: $0.52 against $0.64 per million tokens, 18% less.
  • MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.8 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ranks higher for agents and tool use.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiniMax M2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5
Price per million tokens$0.59 in · $0.79 out$0.30 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.64$0.52
Cheapest host, blended$0.16 (DeepInfra, FP8)$0.44 (Venice)
Intelligence Index7.722.8
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second80–
Context window131,072 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 127 of 161 132 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 174 of 195 80 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 165 of 187 112 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 103 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructMiniMax M2.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3041,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2851,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2981,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2931,381
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3181,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2921,369
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.7022.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 49.8%84.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.6%20.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 47.1%71.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 15.7%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 3.0%34.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 26.6%95.3%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 10.0%41.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.38
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 26.241.7

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than MiniMax M2.5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct ranks higher for agents and tool use; MiniMax M2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5?

MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.64 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Run Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MiniMax M2.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.