Compare / Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta · profile
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5? The short answer

  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper: $0.21 against $0.64 per million tokens, 3.0 times less.
  • MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 25.2 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5
Price per million tokens$0.59 in · $0.79 out$0.17 in · $0.34 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.64$0.21
Cheapest host, blended$0.16 (DeepInfra, FP8)$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)
Intelligence Index7.725.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second80–
Context window131,072 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.3 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 127 of 161 95 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 174 of 195 74 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 165 of 187 60 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 83 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3041,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2851,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2981,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2931,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3181,434
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2921,412
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 11.956.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.7025.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 49.8%84.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.6%27.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 47.1%67.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 15.7%73.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 4.9%63.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 3.0%41.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 26.6%90.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 10.0%16.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 26.256.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.21 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.64 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Run Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MiMo-V2.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.