Compare / Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta · profile
GLM 4.7 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or GLM 4.7 Flash? The short answer

  • GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.64 per million tokens, 4.4 times less.
  • GLM 4.7 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 14.9 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, GLM 4.7 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Llama 3.3 70B InstructGLM 4.7 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.59 in · $0.79 out$0.060 in · $0.40 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.64$0.15
Cheapest host, blended$0.16 (DeepInfra, FP8)$0.15 (Venice, FP8)
Intelligence Index7.714.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second80–
Context window131,072 tokens200,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 3.3 70B InstructGLM 4.7 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 127 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 174 of 195 139 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 165 of 187 148 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 109 of 153
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) not measured 22 of 22

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 3.3 70B InstructGLM 4.7 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3041,368
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2851,306
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2981,386
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2931,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3181,365
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2921,331
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.7014.9
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 49.8%58.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.6%7.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 47.1%60.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 15.7%41.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 3.0%22.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 26.6%98.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 10.0%39.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 26.225.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GLM 4.7 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.64 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

Run Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and GLM 4.7 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.