Compare / Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout
Llama 4 Maverick vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 23 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout? The short answer
- Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.28 against $0.42 per million tokens, 32% less.
- Llama 4 Maverick scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 10.0 against 8.1.
- On our business benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.
- On our business benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for writing.
At a glance
| Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.27 in · $0.85 out | $0.18 in · $0.59 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.42 | $0.28 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.30 (DigitalOcean) | $0.15 (DeepInfra, FP8) |
| Intelligence Index | 10.0 | 8.1 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 42 | 42 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,310,720 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 141 of 161 | 148 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 146 of 195 | 164 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 166 of 187 | 163 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | not measured | 46 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Llama 4 Maverick | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,317 | 1,316 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,307 | 1,289 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,326 | 1,309 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,314 | 1,299 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,327 | 1,322 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,312 | 1,305 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 16.3 | 8.20 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 10.0 | 8.10 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 67.1% | 58.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 43.0% | 39.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 50.0% | 27.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Output speedtokens per second | 42.4 | 42.0 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 31.7% | 21.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 7.9% | 3.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 6.8% | 1.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Time to first answer tokenseconds | 0.64 | 0.63 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 3.7% | 3.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 17.8% | 15.5% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 13.0% | 19.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.37 | 0.36 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 24.0 | 26.7 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Llama 4 Scout?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Llama 4 Maverick ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge; Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for writing.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.28 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.42 for Llama 4 Maverick.
Which is faster, Llama 4 Maverick or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Maverick writes about 42 tokens a second on its usual API, against 42 for Llama 4 Scout (Artificial Analysis).
Run Llama 4 Maverick and Llama 4 Scout on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.