Compare / Llama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M2

Llama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M2

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 4 Scout
Meta · profile
MiniMax M2
MiniMax · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Llama 4 Scout or MiniMax M2? The short answer

  • Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.28 against $0.52 per million tokens, 46% less.
  • MiniMax M2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 18.6 against 8.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiniMax M2 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

Llama 4 ScoutMiniMax M2
Price per million tokens$0.18 in · $0.59 out$0.30 in · $1.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.28$0.52
Cheapest host, blended$0.15 (DeepInfra, FP8)$0.45 (Minimax, FP8)
Intelligence Index8.118.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second42–
Context window1,310,720 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 4 ScoutMiniMax M2
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 148 of 161 149 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 164 of 195 107 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 163 of 187 167 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 46 of 153 150 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 4 ScoutMiniMax M2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3161,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2891,285
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3091,350
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2991,334
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3221,343
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3051,298
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 8.1018.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 58.7%77.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.8%13.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 39.5%72.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 27.7%64.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 1.5%25.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 15.5%86.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 19.0%73.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 26.717.2

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 4 Scout better than MiniMax M2?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts; MiniMax M2 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or MiniMax M2?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.28 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.52 for MiniMax M2.

Run Llama 4 Scout and MiniMax M2 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.