Compare / Llama 4 Scout vs Ministral 3 8B 2512
Llama 4 Scout vs Ministral 3 8B 2512
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 19 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Llama 4 Scout or Ministral 3 8B 2512? The short answer
- Ministral 3 8B 2512 is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.28 per million tokens, 47% less.
- Llama 4 Scout scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 8.1 against 5.5.
- Ministral 3 8B 2512 writes faster: 103 tokens a second against 42.
- On our business benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and sticking to the facts.
- On our business benchmarks, Ministral 3 8B 2512 ranks higher for writing.
At a glance
| Llama 4 Scout | Ministral 3 8B 2512 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.18 in · $0.59 out | $0.15 in · $0.15 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.28 | $0.15 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.15 (DeepInfra, FP8) | $0.15 (Mistral) |
| Intelligence Index | 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 42 | 103 |
| Context window | 1,310,720 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | France |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Llama 4 Scout | Ministral 3 8B 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 148 of 161 | 150 of 161 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 164 of 195 | 184 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 163 of 187 | 156 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 46 of 153 | 147 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Ministral 3 8B 2512 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 8.20 | 9.70 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 8.10 | 5.50 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 58.7% | 47.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 3.8% | 4.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 39.5% | 29.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 27.7% | 25.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Output speedtokens per second | 42.0 | 103 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 21.3% | 20.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 1.5% | 4.5% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Time to first answer tokenseconds | 0.63 | 0.48 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 3.3% | 3.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 15.5% | 26.6% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 19.0% | 23.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 26.7 | 28.8 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.0% | 99.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 7.7% | 21.7% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Llama 4 Scout better than Ministral 3 8B 2512?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and sticking to the facts; Ministral 3 8B 2512 ranks higher for writing.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Ministral 3 8B 2512?
Ministral 3 8B 2512 costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.28 for Llama 4 Scout.
Which is faster, Llama 4 Scout or Ministral 3 8B 2512?
Ministral 3 8B 2512 writes about 103 tokens a second on its usual API, against 42 for Llama 4 Scout (Artificial Analysis).
Run Llama 4 Scout and Ministral 3 8B 2512 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.