Compare / Llama 4 Scout vs Hy3 preview
Llama 4 Scout vs Hy3 preview
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Llama 4 Scout or Hy3 preview? The short answer
- Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.28 against $0.29 per million tokens, 1% less.
- Hy3 preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.7 against 8.1.
- On our business benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
- On our business benchmarks, Hy3 preview ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
At a glance
| Llama 4 Scout | Hy3 preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.18 in · $0.59 out | $0.18 in · $0.60 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.28 | $0.29 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.15 (DeepInfra, FP8) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 8.1 | 22.7 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 42 | – |
| Context window | 1,310,720 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Llama 4 Scout | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 148 of 161 | not measured |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 164 of 195 | 73 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 163 of 187 | 86 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 46 of 153 | 128 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | Llama 4 Scout | Hy3 preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,316 | 1,411 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,289 | 1,354 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,309 | 1,446 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,299 | 1,397 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,322 | 1,409 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,305 | 1,378 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 8.10 | 22.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 58.7% | 86.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 3.8% | 27.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 39.5% | 63.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 27.7% | 64.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 1.5% | 34.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 15.5% | 92.7% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 19.0% | 18.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 26.7 | 51.1 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is Llama 4 Scout better than Hy3 preview?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Llama 4 Scout ranks higher for sticking to the facts; Hy3 preview ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Hy3 preview?
Llama 4 Scout costs $0.28 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.29 for Hy3 preview.
Run Llama 4 Scout and Hy3 preview on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.