Compare / Llama 4 Scout vs Grok 4.5

Llama 4 Scout vs Grok 4.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Llama 4 Scout
Meta · profile
Grok 4.5
xAI · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3

Llama 4 Scout or Grok 4.5? The short answer

  • Llama 4 Scout is cheaper: $0.28 against $3.00 per million tokens, 11 times less.
  • Grok 4.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 38.8 against 8.1.
  • On our business benchmarks, Grok 4.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Llama 4 ScoutGrok 4.5
Price per million tokens$0.18 in · $0.59 out$2.00 in · $6.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.28$3.00
Cheapest host, blended$0.15 (DeepInfra, FP8)$3.00 (xAI)
Intelligence Index8.138.8
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second42–
Context window1,310,720 tokens500,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseLlama 4 ScoutGrok 4.5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 148 of 161 43 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 26 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 164 of 195 22 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 163 of 187 38 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 46 of 153 43 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricLlama 4 ScoutGrok 4.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3161,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2891,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3091,488
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2991,462
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3221,465
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3051,459
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 8.2072.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 8.1038.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 58.7%93.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.8%42.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 27.7%79.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 21.3%55.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 3.7%81.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%10.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 3.3%42.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 19.0%21.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.32
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 26.760.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Grok 4.5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Grok 4.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Grok 4.5?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.28 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $3.00 for Grok 4.5.

Run Llama 4 Scout and Grok 4.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.