Compare / Muse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-4.1

Muse Spark 1.2 vs GPT-4.1

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 12 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
GPT-4.1
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
12
Shared sources
3

Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-4.1? The short answer

  • Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $2.00 against $3.50 per million tokens, 43% less.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 39.6 against 12.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.2 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Muse Spark 1.2GPT-4.1
Price per million tokens$1.25 in · $4.25 out$2.00 in · $8.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$2.00$3.50
Cheapest host, blended–$3.50 (Azure)
Intelligence Index39.612.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,047,576 tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseMuse Spark 1.2GPT-4.1
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 37 of 161 40 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 38 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 27 of 195 148 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 5 of 187 54 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 16 of 153 92 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricMuse Spark 1.2GPT-4.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4841,408
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,5191,415
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4481,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5021,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4751,403
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4961,415
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4721,405
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 39.612.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 90.4%66.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 45.5%4.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%68.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 60.3%31.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than GPT-4.1?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Muse Spark 1.2 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or GPT-4.1?

Muse Spark 1.2 costs $2.00 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $3.50 for GPT-4.1.

Run Muse Spark 1.2 and GPT-4.1 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.