Compare / Phi 4 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Phi 4 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Phi 4
Microsoft · profile
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

Phi 4 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro? The short answer

  • Phi 4 is cheaper: $0.088 against $0.54 per million tokens, 6.2 times less.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 26.0 against 5.9.
  • On our business benchmarks, Phi 4 ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5-Pro ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

Phi 4MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Price per million tokens$0.070 in · $0.14 out$0.43 in · $0.87 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.088$0.54
Cheapest host, blended–$0.38 (GMICloud, BF16)
Intelligence Index5.926.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second42–
Context window16,384 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use casePhi 4MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 122 of 161 86 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 178 of 195 60 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 175 of 187 41 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 3 of 153 28 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricPhi 4MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,2561,471
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2101,435
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2681,506
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2451,469
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,2561,467
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2291,450
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 5.9026.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 57.5%86.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 3.8%35.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 23.5%79.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 0.0%79.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 3.8%43.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 0.0%94.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 19.0%8.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.340.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 25.757.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Phi 4 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Phi 4 ranks higher for sticking to the facts; MiMo-V2.5-Pro ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, Phi 4 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Phi 4 costs $0.088 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.54 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Run Phi 4 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.