Compare / MiniMax M2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

MiniMax M2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax · profile
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Mistral · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3

MiniMax M2.5 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B? The short answer

  • Mistral Small 3.2 24B is cheaper: $0.13 against $0.52 per million tokens, 4.0 times less.
  • MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.8 against 8.2.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiniMax M2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, Mistral Small 3.2 24B ranks higher for agents and tool use.

At a glance

MiniMax M2.5Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Price per million tokens$0.30 in · $1.20 out$0.094 in · $0.25 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.52$0.13
Cheapest host, blended$0.44 (Venice)$0.11 (DeepInfra, FP8)
Intelligence Index22.88.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window204,800 tokens256,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaFrance

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseMiniMax M2.5Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 132 of 161 118 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 80 of 195 163 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 112 of 187 130 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 103 of 153 not measured

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricMiniMax M2.5Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4001,363
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3571,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4251,335
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3811,338
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3911,357
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3691,329
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 22.88.20
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 84.8%50.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 20.5%4.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 71.6%33.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 73.3%20.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 34.8%6.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 95.3%29.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 41.0%17.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.380.35
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 41.736.3

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is MiniMax M2.5 better than Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, MiniMax M2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing; Mistral Small 3.2 24B ranks higher for agents and tool use.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.5 or Mistral Small 3.2 24B?

Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs $0.13 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.52 for MiniMax M2.5.

Run MiniMax M2.5 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.