Compare / MiniMax M2.7 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

MiniMax M2.7 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax · profile
Ministral 3 14B 2512
Mistral · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

MiniMax M2.7 or Ministral 3 14B 2512? The short answer

  • Ministral 3 14B 2512 is cheaper: $0.20 against $0.52 per million tokens, 2.6 times less.
  • MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.8 against 6.0.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

MiniMax M2.7Ministral 3 14B 2512
Price per million tokens$0.30 in · $1.20 out$0.20 in · $0.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.52$0.20
Cheapest host, blended$0.37 (GMICloud, FP8)$0.20 (Mistral)
Intelligence Index22.86.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–91
Context window204,800 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaFrance

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseMiniMax M2.7Ministral 3 14B 2512
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 100 of 161 128 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 68 of 195 167 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 108 of 187 143 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 124 of 153 146 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricMiniMax M2.7Ministral 3 14B 2512
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 52.614.4
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 22.86.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 87.4%57.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 29.6%4.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.7%32.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.3%26.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 50.1%23.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 55.4%9.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 39.4%4.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 9.9%6.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 84.8%27.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 36.0%24.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.380.32
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 37.631.4
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.4%99.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.9%19.4%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is MiniMax M2.7 better than Ministral 3 14B 2512?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, MiniMax M2.7 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?

Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.52 for MiniMax M2.7.

Run MiniMax M2.7 and Ministral 3 14B 2512 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.