Compare / MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-5.2

MiniMax M2.7 vs GPT-5.2

18 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax · profile
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
4
BenchmarkMetricMiniMax M2.7GPT-5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4221,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4231,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3631,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4521,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4071,427
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4151,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3861,411
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 43.4%58.8%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 27.9%30.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 18.8%50.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 25.5%65.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 75.6%74.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 69.1%73.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 36.0%76.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.380.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 37.649.4
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.4%100.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 12.9%8.4%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.