Compare / Mistral Large 4 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
Mistral Large 4 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 33 results on 2 sources that measured both models.
Results as of 8 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-08-4199ce0620fe).
Mistral Large 4 or GLM-5V-Turbo? The short answer
Pick Mistral Large 4: it scores higher (Spring Prompt overall 37 against 11) and costs less.
- Spring Prompt overall: Mistral Large 4 37, GLM-5V-Turbo 11 (out of 100; how the score works).
- Mistral Large 4 is cheaper to run: $0.003 against $0.007 per product listing on CatalogBench (2.1 times less).
- Mistral Large 4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 38.4 against 23.5.
- Mistral Large 4 is newer: released 6 Oct 2026, against 1 Apr 2026 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- On our own benchmarks, on the results both models have: Mistral Large 4 does better for product listings.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Mistral Large 4 does better for reasoning and knowledge.
At a glance
| Mistral Large 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $1.36 in · $4.18 out | $1.20 in · $4.00 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $2.06 | $1.90 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | – |
| Cost per product listing (CatalogBench) | $0.003 | $0.007 |
| Intelligence Index | 38.4 | 23.5 |
| Spring Prompt overall | 37 | 11 |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 106 | – |
| Context window | 524,288 tokens | 202,752 tokens |
| Released | 6 Oct 2026 (newer) | 1 Apr 2026 |
| Weights | Closed | Closed |
| Developer based in | France | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | Mistral Large 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live | 18 of 20 | 19 of 20 |
| Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is | 19 of 19 | not measured |
| User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled | 4 of 8 | not measured |
| Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending | 10 of 19 | not measured |
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 21 of 164 | not measured |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 44 of 198 | 97 of 198 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | not measured | 77 of 188 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | not measured | 80 of 152 |
| Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) | 13 of 22 | not measured |
From our research
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Mistral Large 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| CatalogBench measured by Spring Prompt · 3 results | ||
| Cost per productUS dollars, lower is better | $0.0033 | $0.0070 |
| Reliably publish-ready% of products, higher is better | 10.7%high reasoning | 1.8% |
| Reliably publish-ready · sales brief% of products, higher is better | 1.8%high reasoning | 0.0% |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better | 38.4 | 23.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better | 35.0% | 17.1% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better | 81.3% | 70.3% |
Show all 33 results (27 more)
| Measure | Mistral Large 4 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| CatalogBench measured by Spring Prompt · 27 results | ||
| Channel compliance% of products, higher is better | 100.0% | 98.3% |
| Channel rules broken% of products, lower is better | 3.0% | 1.2% |
| Channel rules broken · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 1.2% | 0.6% |
| Claims to check% of products, lower is better | 0.7%high reasoning | 11.5% |
| Claims to check · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 3.3%high reasoning | 28.9% |
| Conflicts caught% of conflicts, higher is better | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Content quality% of checks, higher is better | 96.5% | 63.3% |
| Content quality · sales brief% of checks, higher is better | 95.9% | 16.8% |
| Decision accuracy% of decisions, higher is better | 93.1% | 61.0% |
| Failed outputs% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 32.1% |
| Failed outputs · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 82.1% |
| Field accuracy% of missing fields, higher is better | 94.4% | 59.6% |
| Invented values% of filled values, lower is better | 3.5% | 3.8% |
| Missing UK information% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Missing UK information · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Not findable% of products, lower is better | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| Not findable · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 3.0%high reasoning | 1.8% |
| Publish-ready listings% of products, higher is better | 39.9%high reasoning | 10.1% |
| Publish-ready listings · sales brief% of products, higher is better | 10.7%high reasoning | 0.0% |
| Unsupported claims% of products, lower is better | 33.3%high reasoning | 55.4% |
| Unsupported claimsclaims per product, lower is better | 0.91high reasoning | 2.49 |
| Unsupported claims · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 80.4%high reasoning | 17.9% |
| Unsupported claims · sales briefclaims per product, lower is better | 3.69high reasoning | 1.31 |
| Wrong attributes% of products, lower is better | 19.6%high reasoning | 13.1% |
| Wrong attributes · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 17.3%high reasoning | 3.6% |
| Wrong category or variant% of products, lower is better | 1.2% | 1.2% |
| Wrong category or variant · sales brief% of products, lower is better | 1.8% | 1.2% |
Quick answers
Is Mistral Large 4 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
Pick Mistral Large 4: it scores higher (Spring Prompt overall 37 against 11) and costs less.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4 or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Mistral Large 4 is cheaper to run: $0.003 against $0.007 per product listing on CatalogBench (2.1 times less).
Run Mistral Large 4 and GLM-5V-Turbo on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.