Compare / Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 13 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Mistral · profile
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
13
Shared sources
3

Mistral Small 3.1 24B or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)? The short answer

  • Mistral Small 3.1 24B is cheaper: $0.40 against $7.50 per million tokens, 19 times less.
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (7.1 and 7.3).
  • On our business benchmarks, Mistral Small 3.1 24B ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) ranks higher for writing.

At a glance

Mistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Price per million tokens$0.35 in · $0.56 out$5.00 in · $15.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.40$7.50
Cheapest host, blended–$7.50 (Azure)
Intelligence Index7.17.3
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inFrancethe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseMistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 114 of 161 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 172 of 195 182 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 157 of 187 88 of 187

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricMistral Small 3.1 24BGPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,2971,322
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2701,338
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3021,311
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2941,326
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3031,346
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2901,345
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 26.324.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.107.30
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 45.4%52.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.3%1.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 11.0%12.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.163.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Mistral Small 3.1 24B ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) ranks higher for writing.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.40 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $7.50 for GPT-4o (2024-05-13).

Run Mistral Small 3.1 24B and GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.