Compare / Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Kimi K2.5 vs GPT-4.1 Nano

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI · profile
GPT-4.1 Nano
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Kimi K2.5 or GPT-4.1 Nano? The short answer

  • GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper: $0.18 against $1.14 per million tokens, 6.5 times less.
  • Kimi K2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 23.5 against 7.8.
  • On our business benchmarks, Kimi K2.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Kimi K2.5GPT-4.1 Nano
Price per million tokens$0.57 in · $2.85 out$0.10 in · $0.40 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.14$0.18
Cheapest host, blended$0.90 (SiliconFlow, INT4)$0.18 (Azure)
Intelligence Index23.57.8
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window262,144 tokens1,047,576 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseKimi K2.5GPT-4.1 Nano
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 85 of 161 139 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 65 of 195 169 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 46 of 187 162 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 106 of 153 151 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricKimi K2.5GPT-4.1 Nano
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4411,321
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4231,307
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4831,313
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4391,300
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4501,322
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4281,299
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 46.811.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 23.57.80
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 87.9%51.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 30.7%3.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 70.2%32.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%20.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 45.7%3.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 34.8%3.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 14.2%3.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 95.9%17.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 34.3%6.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Kimi K2.5 better than GPT-4.1 Nano?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Kimi K2.5 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or GPT-4.1 Nano?

GPT-4.1 Nano costs $0.18 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.14 for Kimi K2.5.

Run Kimi K2.5 and GPT-4.1 Nano on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.