Compare / Kimi K2.5 vs Inkling

Kimi K2.5 vs Inkling

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI · profile
Inkling
Thinkingmachines · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

Kimi K2.5 or Inkling? The short answer

  • Kimi K2.5 is cheaper: $1.14 against $1.72 per million tokens, 34% less.
  • Inkling scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 25.0 against 23.5.
  • On our business benchmarks, Kimi K2.5 ranks higher for writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Kimi K2.5Inkling
Price per million tokens$0.57 in · $2.85 out$0.95 in · $4.05 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.14$1.72
Cheapest host, blended$0.90 (SiliconFlow, INT4)$1.72 (DeepInfra, FP8)
Intelligence Index23.525.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–166
Context window262,144 tokens524,288 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseKimi K2.5Inkling
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 85 of 161 56 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 45 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 65 of 195 64 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 46 of 187 59 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 106 of 153 75 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricKimi K2.5Inkling
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4451,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4411,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4231,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4831,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4391,427
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4501,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4281,403
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 46.852.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 23.525.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 87.9%87.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 30.7%31.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.0%77.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 45.7%55.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 14.2%29.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 34.3%40.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Inkling?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Kimi K2.5 ranks higher for writing; Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Inkling?

Kimi K2.5 costs $1.14 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.72 for Inkling.

Run Kimi K2.5 and Inkling on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.