Compare / Kimi K2.7 Code vs Inkling

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Inkling

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 13 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI · profile
Inkling
Thinkingmachines · profile
Results compared
13
Shared sources
3

Kimi K2.7 Code or Inkling? The short answer

  • Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper: $1.71 against $1.72 per million tokens, 1% less.
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (25.8 and 25.0).
  • Inkling writes faster: 166 tokens a second against 83.
  • On our business benchmarks, Kimi K2.7 Code ranks higher for professional work and reasoning and knowledge.
  • On our business benchmarks, Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Kimi K2.7 CodeInkling
Price per million tokens$0.95 in · $4.00 out$0.95 in · $4.05 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$1.71$1.72
Cheapest host, blended$1.28 (StreamLake)$1.72 (DeepInfra, FP8)
Intelligence Index25.825.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second83166
Context window262,144 tokens524,288 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseKimi K2.7 CodeInkling
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 57 of 161 56 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 41 of 51 45 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 54 of 195 64 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality not measured 59 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 98 of 153 75 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricKimi K2.7 CodeInkling
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 37.6%33.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 60.852.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 25.825.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.6%87.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 35.0%31.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.3%77.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedOutput speedtokens per second 83.2166
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 47.8%47.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 67.4%55.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 1.0%1.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTime to first answer tokenseconds 28.014.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 20.2%29.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 36.5%40.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Inkling?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Kimi K2.7 Code ranks higher for professional work and reasoning and knowledge; Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Inkling?

Kimi K2.7 Code costs $1.71 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.72 for Inkling.

Which is faster, Kimi K2.7 Code or Inkling?

Inkling writes about 166 tokens a second on its usual API, against 83 for Kimi K2.7 Code (Artificial Analysis).

Run Kimi K2.7 Code and Inkling on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.