Compare / llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 vs GPT-5.2

llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1 vs GPT-5.2

13 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

llama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1
NVIDIA · profile
GPT-5.2
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
13
Shared sources
2
BenchmarkMetricllama-3.1-nemotron-ultra-253b-v1GPT-5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3421,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3311,391
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3511,427
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3481,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3211,411
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 100.0%87.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 0.0%45.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 0.0%43.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 10.0%55.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 0.0%75.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 0.0%81.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 0.0%70.4%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 0.0%75.5%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.