Compare / GPT-4.1 vs MiMo-V2.5

GPT-4.1 vs MiMo-V2.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

GPT-4.1
OpenAI · profile
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

GPT-4.1 or MiMo-V2.5? The short answer

  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper: $0.21 against $3.50 per million tokens, 17 times less.
  • MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 25.2 against 12.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-4.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use and writing.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

GPT-4.1MiMo-V2.5
Price per million tokens$2.00 in · $8.00 out$0.17 in · $0.34 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$3.50$0.21
Cheapest host, blended$3.50 (Azure)$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)
Intelligence Index12.725.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,047,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGPT-4.1MiMo-V2.5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 40 of 161 95 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 148 of 195 74 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 54 of 187 60 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 92 of 153 83 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGPT-4.1MiMo-V2.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4081,439
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4151,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4021,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4051,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4031,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4151,434
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4051,412
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 12.725.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 66.6%84.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.2%27.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 43.0%67.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 68.3%73.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 13.6%41.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 47.1%90.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 6.0%16.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 67.556.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is GPT-4.1 better than MiMo-V2.5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GPT-4.1 ranks higher for agents and tool use and writing; MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.21 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $3.50 for GPT-4.1.

Run GPT-4.1 and MiMo-V2.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.