Compare / GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GLM 4.7 Flash

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GLM 4.7 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)
OpenAI · profile
GLM 4.7 Flash
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or GLM 4.7 Flash? The short answer

  • GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $4.38 per million tokens, 30 times less.
  • GLM 4.7 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 14.9 against 7.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ranks higher for sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, GLM 4.7 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)GLM 4.7 Flash
Price per million tokens$2.50 in · $10.00 out$0.060 in · $0.40 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$4.38$0.15
Cheapest host, blended$4.38 (Azure)$0.15 (Venice, FP8)
Intelligence Index7.714.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window128,000 tokens200,000 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGPT-4o (2024-08-06)GLM 4.7 Flash
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 176 of 195 139 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 152 of 187 148 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 105 of 153 109 of 153
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) not measured 22 of 22

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGPT-4o (2024-08-06)GLM 4.7 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3021,368
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3271,306
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3121,386
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3191,348
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3361,365
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3411,331
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 7.7014.9
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 52.1%58.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 2.3%7.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 36.0%60.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 41.0%41.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 8.3%22.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 28.9%98.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 93.8%91.6%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 9.6%9.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) ranks higher for sticking to the facts; GLM 4.7 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or GLM 4.7 Flash?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.38 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06).

Run GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and GLM 4.7 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.