Compare / GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GLM 4.7

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GLM 4.7

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 14 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
OpenAI · profile
GLM 4.7
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
14
Shared sources
3

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GLM 4.7? The short answer

  • GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) is cheaper: $0.26 against $0.90 per million tokens, 3.4 times less.
  • GLM 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.2 against 6.7.
  • On our business benchmarks, GLM 4.7 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GLM 4.7
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $0.60 out$0.54 in · $1.98 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.26$0.90
Cheapest host, blended–$0.74 (DeepInfra, FP4)
Intelligence Index6.722.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window128,000 tokens204,800 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GLM 4.7
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 155 of 161 99 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 185 of 195 76 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 164 of 187 70 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 148 of 153 102 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GLM 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3111,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2941,404
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,2851,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2931,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3181,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3141,416
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 11.445.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 6.7022.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 42.6%85.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 4.2%27.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 31.0%67.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 5.6%45.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 2.9%12.2%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 8.3%32.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than GLM 4.7?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GLM 4.7 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GLM 4.7?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.26 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.90 for GLM 4.7.

Run GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GLM 4.7 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.