Compare / GPT-5.1 vs Inkling

GPT-5.1 vs Inkling

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 15 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

GPT-5.1
OpenAI · profile
Inkling
Thinkingmachines · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3

GPT-5.1 or Inkling? The short answer

  • Inkling is cheaper: $1.72 against $3.44 per million tokens, 50% less.
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.7 and 25.0).
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-5.1 ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts.
  • On our business benchmarks, Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.

At a glance

GPT-5.1Inkling
Price per million tokens$1.25 in · $10.00 out$0.95 in · $4.05 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$3.44$1.72
Cheapest host, blended$1.72 (OpenAI)$1.72 (DeepInfra, FP8)
Intelligence Index24.725.0
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–166
Context window400,000 tokens524,288 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGPT-5.1Inkling
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 82 of 161 56 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 45 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 66 of 195 64 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 52 of 187 59 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 62 of 153 75 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGPT-5.1Inkling
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4591,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4481,444
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4281,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4821,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4501,427
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4561,442
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4371,403
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 49.452.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 24.725.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 87.3%87.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 28.5%31.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 80.0%77.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 52.4%55.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 15.9%29.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 48.0%40.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is GPT-5.1 better than Inkling?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GPT-5.1 ranks higher for writing and sticking to the facts; Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1 or Inkling?

Inkling costs $1.72 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $3.44 for GPT-5.1.

Run GPT-5.1 and Inkling on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.