Compare / GPT-5.2 vs GLM 5

GPT-5.2 vs GLM 5

24 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

GPT-5.2
OpenAI · profile
GLM 5
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
24
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricGPT-5.2GLM 5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4421,452
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4441,451
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3911,447
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4751,481
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4271,446
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4371,457
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4111,447
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 58.8%49.4%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 30.9%35.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 50.0%31.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 65.5%60.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 74.6%73.4%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 73.2%47.3%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 72.0%70.0%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 83.0%82.5%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 51.8%43.9%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 81.6%73.7%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 71.9%62.3%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 89.7%86.8%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 76.0%34.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.400.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 49.455.0
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 100.0%99.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 8.4%10.1%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.