Compare / GPT-5.6 Terra vs Step 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Step 3.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI · profile
Step 3.5 Flash
Stepfun · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

GPT-5.6 Terra or Step 3.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $4.50 per million tokens, 30 times less.
  • GPT-5.6 Terra scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 42.1 against 16.6.
  • On our business benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Terra ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

GPT-5.6 TerraStep 3.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$2.00 in · $12.00 out$0.10 in · $0.30 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$4.50$0.15
Cheapest host, blended$2.25 (OpenAI)–
Intelligence Index42.116.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second104–
Context window1,050,000 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseGPT-5.6 TerraStep 3.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 16 of 161 not measured
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 10 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 20 of 195 96 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 39 of 187 99 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 49 of 153 123 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricGPT-5.6 TerraStep 3.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4671,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4661,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4281,345
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5041,429
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4621,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4651,393
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4451,366
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 42.116.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.5%83.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 42.9%21.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 71.2%64.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 83.0%50.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 62.9%27.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 86.3%94.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 22.0%42.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.390.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 60.445.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is GPT-5.6 Terra better than Step 3.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GPT-5.6 Terra ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Terra or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $4.50 for GPT-5.6 Terra.

Run GPT-5.6 Terra and Step 3.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.