Compare / gpt-oss-120b vs Step 3.5 Flash

gpt-oss-120b vs Step 3.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

gpt-oss-120b
OpenAI · profile
Step 3.5 Flash
Stepfun · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

gpt-oss-120b or Step 3.5 Flash? The short answer

  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.26 per million tokens, 43% less.
  • Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.6 against 11.6.
  • On our business benchmarks, Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

gpt-oss-120bStep 3.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $0.60 out$0.10 in · $0.30 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.26$0.15
Cheapest host, blended$0.065 (CoreWeave, FP4)–
Intelligence Index11.616.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second200–
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use casegpt-oss-120bStep 3.5 Flash
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 117 of 161 not measured
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 49 of 51 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 110 of 195 96 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 131 of 187 99 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 138 of 153 123 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricgpt-oss-120bStep 3.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3851,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3511,390
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2771,345
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3571,429
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3231,384
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3521,393
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3091,366
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 11.616.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 78.2%83.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 19.6%21.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 69.0%64.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 52.0%50.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 23.5%27.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 65.8%94.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 107.0%42.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.290.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 38.545.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is gpt-oss-120b better than Step 3.5 Flash?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Step 3.5 Flash ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.26 for gpt-oss-120b.

Run gpt-oss-120b and Step 3.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.