Compare / gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling
gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 19 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
gpt-oss-120b or Inkling? The short answer
- gpt-oss-120b is cheaper: $0.26 against $1.72 per million tokens, 6.6 times less.
- Inkling scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 25.0 against 11.6.
- gpt-oss-120b writes faster: 200 tokens a second against 166.
- On our business benchmarks, Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use, professional work, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
At a glance
| gpt-oss-120b | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.15 in · $0.60 out | $0.95 in · $4.05 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.26 | $1.72 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.065 (CoreWeave, FP4) | $1.72 (DeepInfra, FP8) |
| Intelligence Index | 11.6 | 25.0 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 200 | 166 |
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 524,288 tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | the US | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.
| Use case | gpt-oss-120b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls | 117 of 161 | 56 of 161 |
| Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects | 49 of 51 | 45 of 51 |
| Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge | 110 of 195 | 64 of 195 |
| WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality | 131 of 187 | 59 of 187 |
| Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers | 138 of 153 | 75 of 153 |
Every shared result
| Benchmark | Metric | gpt-oss-120b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agentsreported | Tasks passed% of tasks | 4.4% | 33.8% |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,385 | 1,452 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,351 | 1,444 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,277 | 1,384 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,357 | 1,474 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,323 | 1,427 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,352 | 1,442 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,309 | 1,403 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 30.4 | 52.1 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 11.6 | 25.0 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 78.2% | 87.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 19.6% | 31.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 52.0% | 77.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Output speedtokens per second | 200 | 166 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 34.0% | 47.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 26.2% | 55.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Time to first answer tokenseconds | 10.5 | 14.3 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 12.8% | 29.1% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.
Quick answers
Is gpt-oss-120b better than Inkling?
It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, Inkling ranks higher for agents and tool use, professional work, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Inkling?
gpt-oss-120b costs $0.26 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $1.72 for Inkling.
Which is faster, gpt-oss-120b or Inkling?
gpt-oss-120b writes about 200 tokens a second on its usual API, against 166 for Inkling (Artificial Analysis).
Run gpt-oss-120b and Inkling on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.