Compare / gpt-oss-20b vs o3

gpt-oss-20b vs o3

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

gpt-oss-20b
OpenAI · profile
o3
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3

gpt-oss-20b or o3? The short answer

  • gpt-oss-20b is cheaper: $0.060 against $3.50 per million tokens, 58 times less.
  • o3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 20.2 against 10.0.
  • gpt-oss-20b writes faster: 249 tokens a second against 126.
  • On our business benchmarks, o3 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

At a glance

gpt-oss-20bo3
Price per million tokens$0.030 in · $0.15 out$2.00 in · $8.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.060$3.50
Cheapest host, blended$0.036 (Darkbloom, FP8)–
Intelligence Index10.020.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second249126
Context window131,072 tokens200,000 tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inthe USthe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use casegpt-oss-20bo3
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 124 of 161 13 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 134 of 195 95 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 170 of 187 49 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 91 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricgpt-oss-20bo3
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3231,426
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,2401,383
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3141,449
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,2811,403
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3181,432
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,2751,396
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 10.020.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 68.8%82.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 11.0%20.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 65.1%71.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 34.7%74.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedOutput speedtokens per second 249126
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 10.6%37.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTime to first answer tokenseconds 8.493.96
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 60.2%80.7%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 98.0%18.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.310.30
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 24.666.8

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is gpt-oss-20b better than o3?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, o3 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-20b or o3?

gpt-oss-20b costs $0.060 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $3.50 for o3.

Which is faster, gpt-oss-20b or o3?

gpt-oss-20b writes about 249 tokens a second on its usual API, against 126 for o3 (Artificial Analysis).

Run gpt-oss-20b and o3 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.