Compare / o3 vs GLM 5.3

o3 vs GLM 5.3

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 14 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

o3
OpenAI · profile
GLM 5.3
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
14
Shared sources
3

o3 or GLM 5.3? The short answer

  • GLM 5.3 is cheaper: $2.15 against $3.50 per million tokens, 39% less.
  • GLM 5.3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 44.8 against 20.2.
  • o3 writes faster: 126 tokens a second against 75.
  • On our business benchmarks, GLM 5.3 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

o3GLM 5.3
Price per million tokens$2.00 in · $8.00 out$1.40 in · $4.40 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$3.50$2.15
Cheapest host, blended–$0.65 (Novita, FP8)
Intelligence Index20.244.8
Spring Prompt overall–39
Output speed, tokens a second12675
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Developer based inthe USChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseo3GLM 5.3
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending not measured 16 of 18
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 13 of 161 11 of 161
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 15 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 95 of 195 24 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 49 of 187 20 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 91 of 153 52 of 153
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) not measured 18 of 21

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetrico3GLM 5.3
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4051,468
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4261,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3831,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4491,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4031,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4321,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3961,470
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 20.244.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 82.7%91.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 20.1%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 74.7%79.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedOutput speedtokens per second 12675.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedTime to first answer tokenseconds 3.9629.3
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 49.4%41.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is o3 better than GLM 5.3?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, GLM 5.3 ranks higher for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, o3 or GLM 5.3?

GLM 5.3 costs $2.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $3.50 for o3.

Which is faster, o3 or GLM 5.3?

o3 writes about 126 tokens a second on its usual API, against 75 for GLM 5.3 (Artificial Analysis).

Run o3 and GLM 5.3 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.