Compare / Step 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5

Step 3.5 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

Step 3.5 Flash
Stepfun · profile
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3

Step 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5? The short answer

  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper: $0.15 against $0.21 per million tokens, 29% less.
  • MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 25.2 against 16.6.
  • On our business benchmarks, MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

At a glance

Step 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5
Price per million tokens$0.10 in · $0.30 out$0.17 in · $0.34 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.15$0.21
Cheapest host, blended–$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)
Intelligence Index16.625.2
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window262,144 tokens1,050,000 tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among models available today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. The better rank is in green.

Use caseStep 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls not measured 95 of 161
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 96 of 195 74 of 195
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 99 of 187 60 of 187
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 123 of 153 83 of 153

Every shared result

BenchmarkMetricStep 3.5 FlashMiMo-V2.5
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4171,439
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3901,441
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3451,394
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4291,470
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3841,430
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3931,434
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3661,412
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 16.625.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 83.1%84.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 21.1%27.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 64.6%67.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 50.0%73.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 27.3%41.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.4%90.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 42.0%16.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.370.40
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 45.956.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.

Quick answers

Is Step 3.5 Flash better than MiMo-V2.5?

It depends on the task. Among models available today, on our benchmarks and licensed sources, MiMo-V2.5 ranks higher for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Which is cheaper, Step 3.5 Flash or MiMo-V2.5?

Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.15 per million tokens (three input to one output), against $0.21 for MiMo-V2.5.

Run Step 3.5 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.